OmniShuffle Shuffle加速

Kerberos 5 (KRB5)

1.20.1

HWPSIRT-2024-22950

CVE-2024-37371

0.0

In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.21.3, an attacker can cause invalid memory reads during GSS message token handling by sending message tokens with invalid length fields.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC5

Kerberos 5 (KRB5)

1.20.1

HWPSIRT-2024-42060

CVE-2024-37370

0.0

In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.21.3, an attacker can modify the plaintext Extra Count field of a confidential GSS krb5 wrap token, causing the unwrapped token to appear truncated to the application.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC5

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1wa-2.oe2203sp3

HWPSIRT-2024-55293

CVE-2024-5535

9.1

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an

empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to

be sent to the peer.

Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences

such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue

could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent

to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications

that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of

supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never

be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by

accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling

application.

The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS

applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN

(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and

is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more

widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of

protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns

the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the

client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the

first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap

between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is

called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and

returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports

that there was no overlap in the lists).

This function is typically called from a server side application callback for

ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list

of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in

length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never

normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the

SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list

supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the

application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has

accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has

accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len

parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap"

response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it

will be vulnerable to this problem.

In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select

a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol

in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes

from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.

However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a

client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the

application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of

confidentiality will occur.

This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most

likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not

widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.

Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active

exploitation unlikely.

The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of

OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they

become available.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC3

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1wa-2.oe2203sp3

HWPSIRT-2024-27808

CVE-2024-4741

8.1

** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC2

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1wa-2.oe2203sp3

HWPSIRT-2024-09137

CVE-2024-2511

5.9

Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded

memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions

Impact summary: An attacker may exploit certain server configurations to trigger

unbounded memory growth that would lead to a Denial of Service

This problem can occur in TLSv1.3 if the non-default SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option is

being used (but not if early_data support is also configured and the default

anti-replay protection is in use). In this case, under certain conditions, the

session cache can get into an incorrect state and it will fail to flush properly

as it fills. The session cache will continue to grow in an unbounded manner. A

malicious client could deliberately create the scenario for this failure to

force a Denial of Service. It may also happen by accident in normal operation.

This issue only affects TLS servers supporting TLSv1.3. It does not affect TLS

clients.

The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL

1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC2

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1wa-2.oe2203sp3

HWPSIRT-2024-83093

CVE-2024-0727

5.5

Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL

to crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack

Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted

sources might terminate abruptly.

A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an

untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but

OpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer

dereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12

files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will

be vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),

PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()

and PKCS12_newpass().

We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this

function is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.

The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC2

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1m-15.oe2203sp1

HWPSIRT-2023-63472

CVE-2023-3446

5.3

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()

or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long

delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained

from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those

checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use

a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which

is over 10,000 bits in length.

However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters

that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value

even if it has already been found to be too large.

An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained

from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.

The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.

An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.

The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and

EVP_PKEY_param_check().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications

when using the '-check' option.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1m-15.oe2203sp1

HWPSIRT-2023-48957

CVE-2023-3817

5.3

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()

or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long

delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained

from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing

CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger

an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,

if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is

unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.

An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained

from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.

The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.

An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.

The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and

EVP_PKEY_param_check().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications

when using the "-check" option.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1m-15.oe2203sp1

HWPSIRT-2023-24621

CVE-2023-4807

7.8

Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation

contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the

Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the

AVX512-IFMA instructions.

Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker

can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application

state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences.

The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does

not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform

when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to

the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their

previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors

supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions.

The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can

be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not

depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst

consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application

process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so

the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence,

if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent

calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service.

The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the

CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data)

algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol

versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD

cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using

OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of

any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we

consider this a Low severity security issue.

As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at

runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap:

OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000

The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1m-15.oe2203sp1

HWPSIRT-2024-83093

CVE-2024-0727

5.5

Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL

to crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack

Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted

sources might terminate abruptly.

A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an

untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but

OpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer

dereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12

files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will

be vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),

PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()

and PKCS12_newpass().

We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this

function is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.

The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1m-15.oe2203sp1

HWPSIRT-2023-33676

CVE-2023-2650

6.5

Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or

data containing them may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of

the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message

size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those

messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.

An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -

most of which have no size limit. OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate

an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL

type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the

sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by

periods.

When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large

(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds

of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long

time. The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the

sub-identifiers in bytes (*).

With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /

identifiers in string form was introduced. This includes using OBJECT

IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching

algorithms.

Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure

AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify

what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or

decrypt, or digest passed data.

Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are

affected, with any version of OpenSSL. If the use is for the mere purpose

of display, the severity is considered low.

In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,

CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS. It also impacts anything that processes X.509

certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.

The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a

100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain. Additionally, this only

impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client

authentication.

In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,

such as X.509 certificates. This is assumed to not happen in such a way

that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered

not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,

and the severity is therefore considered low.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

openEuler:openssl

1.1.1m-15.oe2203sp1

HWPSIRT-2023-97265

CVE-2023-5678

5.3

Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking

excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to

generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications

that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()

to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.

Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from

an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),

DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore

vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.

Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large

P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q.

An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and

supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be

vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.

DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of

other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other

functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this

are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the

"-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

Kerberos 5 (KRB5)

1.20.1

HWPSIRT-2023-94697

CVE-2023-36054

0.0

lib/kadm5/kadm_rpc_xdr.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.20.2 and 1.21.x before 1.21.1 frees an uninitialized pointer. A remote authenticated user can trigger a kadmind crash. This occurs because _xdr_kadm5_principal_ent_rec does not validate the relationship between n_key_data and the key_data array count.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1

Apache ZooKeeper

3.8.1

HWPSIRT-2023-31062

CVE-2023-44981

0.0

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache ZooKeeper. If SASL Quorum Peer authentication is enabled in ZooKeeper (quorum.auth.enableSasl=true), the authorization is done by verifying that the instance part in SASL authentication ID is listed in zoo.cfg server list. The instance part in SASL auth ID is optional and if it's missing, like 'eve@EXAMPLE.COM', the authorization check will be skipped. As a result an arbitrary endpoint could join the cluster and begin propagating counterfeit changes to the leader, essentially giving it complete read-write access to the data tree. Quorum Peer authentication is not enabled by default.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.1, 3.8.3, 3.7.2, which fixes the issue.

Alternately ensure the ensemble election/quorum communication is protected by a firewall as this will mitigate the issue.

See the documentation for more details on correct cluster administration.

Kunpeng BoostKit 24.0.RC1