鲲鹏社区首页
中文
注册
我要评分
文档获取效率
文档正确性
内容完整性
文档易理解
在线提单
论坛求助

OmniShuffle Shuffle加速

该版本仅涉及开源及第三方软件漏洞,下表为已修补的开源及第三方软件漏洞列表。

表1 已修补的开源及第三方软件漏洞列表

软件名称

软件版本

漏洞编号

CVE编号

实际CVSS得分

漏洞描述

解决版本

Kerberos 5 (KRB5)

1.20.1

HWPSIRT-2023-94697

CVE-2023-36054

6.5

lib/kadm5/kadm_rpc_xdr.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.20.2 and 1.21.x before 1.21.1 frees an uninitialized pointer. A remote authenticated user can trigger a kadmind crash. This occurs because _xdr_kadm5_principal_ent_rec does not validate the relationship between n_key_data and the key_data array count.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC5

OpenSSL

1.1.1k

HWPSIRT-2022-98220

CVE-2022-1292

9.8

The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).

Kunpeng BoostKit 22.0.RC3

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-63472

CVE-2023-3446

5.3

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience longdelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained

from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those

checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use

a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which

is over 10,000 bits in length.

However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters

that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value

even if it has already been found to be too large.

An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained

from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.

The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.

An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.

The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and

EVP_PKEY_param_check().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications

when using the '-check' option.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-46765

CVE-2023-0286

7.4

There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-62461

CVE-2023-0215

7.5

The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming

ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the

SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by

end user applications.

The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter

BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of

the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS

recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function

returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain

is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains

internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on

to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most

likely result in a crash.

This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which

may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on

the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions

PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream,

SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7.

Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include

i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and

i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream.

The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2022-98220

CVE-2022-1292

9.8

The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-01784

CVE-2023-0466

5.3

The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to

implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate

verification. However the implementation of the function does not

enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect

policies to pass the certificate verification.

As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was

decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()

function.

Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate

policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly

enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with

the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument.

Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not

commonly used by applications.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-59373

CVE-2023-0465

5.3

Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be

vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.

Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by

OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.

A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies

in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.

Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing

the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the

`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-92182

CVE-2022-4450

7.5

The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the name (e.g. CERTIFICATE), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the name_out, header and data arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

Kerberos 5 (KRB5)

1.19.2

HWPSIRT-2021-85745

CVE-2021-37750

6.5

The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.18.5 and 1.19.x before 1.19.3 has a NULL pointer dereference in kdc/do_tgs_req.c via a FAST inner body that lacks a server field.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2022-52393

CVE-2022-2068

9.8

In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-48957

CVE-2023-3817

5.3

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()

or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long

delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained

from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing

CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger

an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,

if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is

unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.

An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained

from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.

The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.

An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.

The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and

EVP_PKEY_param_check().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications

when using the -check option.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-33676

CVE-2023-2650

5.9

Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or

data containing them may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of

the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message

size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those

messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.

An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -

most of which have no size limit. OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate

an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL

type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the

sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by

periods.

When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large

(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds

of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long

time. The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the

sub-identifiers in bytes (*).

With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /

identifiers in string form was introduced. This includes using OBJECT

IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching

algorithms.

Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure

AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify

what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or

decrypt, or digest passed data.

Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are

affected, with any version of OpenSSL. If the use is for the mere purpose

of display, the severity is considered low.

In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,

CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS. It also impacts anything that processes X.509

certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.

The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a

100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain. Additionally, this only

impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client

authentication.

In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,

such as X.509 certificates. This is assumed to not happen in such a way

that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered

not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,

and the severity is therefore considered low.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

Kerberos 5 (KRB5)

1.19.2

HWPSIRT-2022-38656

CVE-2022-42898

8.8

PAC parsing in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.19.4 and 1.20.x before 1.20.1 has integer overflows that may lead to remote code execution (in KDC, kadmind, or a GSS or Kerberos application server) on 32-bit platforms (which have a resultant heap-based buffer overflow), and cause a denial of service on other platforms. This occurs in krb5_pac_parse in lib/krb5/krb/pac.c. Heimdal before 7.7.1 has a similar bug.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

Apache ZooKeeper

3.7.0

HWPSIRT-2021-30464

CVE-2021-34429

5.3

For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the content of the WEB-INF directory and/or bypass some security constraints. This is a variation of the vulnerability reported in CVE-2021-28164/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-25691

CVE-2022-4304

5.9

A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

Apache ZooKeeper

3.7.0

HWPSIRT-2021-42509

CVE-2021-28164

5.3

In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.37.v20210219 to 9.4.38.v20210224, the default compliance mode allows requests with URIs that contain %2e or %2e%2e segments to access protected resources within the WEB-INF directory. For example a request to /context/%2e/WEB-INF/web.xml can retrieve the web.xml file. This can reveal sensitive information regarding the implementation of a web application.

AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of in place encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p).

A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2022-42002

CVE-2022-2097

5.3

of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains

that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this

vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers

exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service

(DoS) attack on affected systems.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

OpenSSL

1.1.1n

HWPSIRT-2023-10355

CVE-2023-0464

7.5

Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing

the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the

`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Kunpeng BoostKit 23.0.RC1

表2 已修复的自研代码(含产品及集成的平台/组件/库)漏洞列表

软件名称

软件版本

漏洞编号

CVE编号

CVSS

漏洞描述

解决版本

KMC

22.0.1.B002

HWPSIRT-2022-32170

NA

NA

KMC流式加解密接口SdpEncryptUpdate、SdpEncryptUpdateEx、 SdpDecryptUpdate、SdpDecryptUpdateEx、 SdpEncryptFinal、SdpEncryptFinalEx、 SdpDecryptFinal、SdpDecryptFinalEx入参异常会导致整数翻转,导致底层密码学库发生内存问题,影响可用性。

Kunpeng BoostKit 21.0.0.SPC2